Wednesday, November 11, 2026 |
Kiara Advani, Sidharth Malhotra embrace parenthood for the second time‘Sometimes we get addicted to our own greatness’: Manoj BajpayeeDulquer Salmaan’s ‘Aakasamlo Oka Tara’ gets November 20 release date‘Mirzapur: The Movie’ crosses Rs 100 crore at domestic box office in opening weekendAmitabh Bachchan admits difficulty decoding Gen Z slangWatch: Nagarjuna releases trailer of Allari Naresh-starrer ‘Ramba Oorvasi Menaka’“Tum bahut lambe ho…”: Big B shares struggles of early acting daysNayanthara reveals how Geethu Mohandas convinced her to join ‘Toxic’Sonu Nigam says childhood anger fuelled his passion and shaped his singing careerYash takes out extra time time to pose for selfies with fans before leaving Mumbai airport

Writ on inaction over High Court division to be heard

Posted March 17th, 2015, 03:48 PM IST

Writ on inaction over High Court division to be heard

Hyderabad: A division bench comprising Chief Justice Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta and Justice P.V. Sanjay Kumar of the Hyderabad High Court on Monday directed the Registry to list a PIL challenging the delay in the constitution of separate High Courts for Telangana and AP for hearing next week. The division of the HCs is sought under Article 214 of the Constitution and Section 32 of the AP Reorganisation Act.

T. Dhangopal Rao, a practising advocate in the High Court, as a party in person, moved the plea stating that the Union law minister has announced that delay in division of the High Court was due to non-concurrence of Chief Ministers of AP and Telangana, which is required for bifurcation of the existing High Court.

The Chief Minister of Telangana had already announced that his government is ready for any arrangement and will shift the Telangana High Court to new premises within 24 hours.

He urged the court to declare the act of AP Chief Minster in delaying concurrence as illegal.

The Registry had raised an objection for listing the case for hearing as the petitioner made Registrar (Vigilance) of the High Court a party to the petition.

The bench asked the petitioner to delete the Registrar as a party to the petition as the official was not concerned with the establishment of the High Court. When the petitioner agreed to the deletion, the bench directed the Registry to list the case.

Sharing

advertisement
Videos