Tuesday, November 10, 2026 |
Kiara Advani, Sidharth Malhotra embrace parenthood for the second time‘Sometimes we get addicted to our own greatness’: Manoj BajpayeeDulquer Salmaan’s ‘Aakasamlo Oka Tara’ gets November 20 release date‘Mirzapur: The Movie’ crosses Rs 100 crore at domestic box office in opening weekendAmitabh Bachchan admits difficulty decoding Gen Z slangWatch: Nagarjuna releases trailer of Allari Naresh-starrer ‘Ramba Oorvasi Menaka’“Tum bahut lambe ho…”: Big B shares struggles of early acting daysNayanthara reveals how Geethu Mohandas convinced her to join ‘Toxic’Sonu Nigam says childhood anger fuelled his passion and shaped his singing careerYash takes out extra time time to pose for selfies with fans before leaving Mumbai airport

Scrapped IT provision was poorly drafted, misused: P Chidambaram

Posted March 24th, 2015, 04:56 PM IST

Scrapped IT provision was poorly drafted, misused: P Chidambaram

New Delhi: Congress leader P Chidambaram on Tuesday welcomed the Supreme Court judgement holding Section 66A of the IT Act as unconstitutional, saying it was poorly drafted and misused.

"I welcome the judgement of the Supreme Court holding that Section 66A of the IT Act is unconstitutional.

"The section was poorly drafted and was vulnerable. It was capable of being misused and, in fact, it was misused," he said.

The former Union Minister, who held the Home and Finance portfolios in UPA government, said there could be a case of misuse of freedom of speech and in such cases ordinary laws should apply and the offender should be dealt with under them.

"If some provisions of the law have to be strengthened, that could be considered. But Section 66A was not the answer," Chidambaram said.

In a landmark judgement upholding freedom of expression, the Supreme Court today struck down a provision in the cyber law which provides power to arrest a person for posting allegedly "offensive" content on websites.

Terming liberty of thought and expression as "cardinal", a bench of justices J Chelameswar and R F Nariman said, "The public's right to know is directly affected by section 66A of the Information Technology Act."

Justice Nariman, who pronounced the verdict in a packed court room, also said that the provision "clearly affects" the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined under the Constitution.

Elaborating on the grounds for holding the provision as "unconstitutional", it said terms like "annoying", "inconvenient" and "grossly offensive", used in the provision are vague as it is difficult for the law enforcement agency and the offender to know the ingredients of the offence.

Sharing

Photos
Latest

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(http://www.indiaaffiliates.in/ads.php?size=300X250): failed to open stream: Connection refused

Filename: views/newsdetails.php

Line Number: 57

Backtrace:

File: /home/sites/43a/5/599366ad77/public_html/application/views/newsdetails.php
Line: 57
Function: file_get_contents

File: /home/sites/43a/5/599366ad77/public_html/application/controllers/News.php
Line: 135
Function: view

File: /home/sites/43a/5/599366ad77/public_html/application/controllers/News.php
Line: 95
Function: newsdetails

File: /home/sites/43a/5/599366ad77/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

Opinion Poll
shambo shankara movie
Hit
Average
flop
Advertisement
advertisement
Videos