Saturday, July 25, 2026 |
Ravi Teja begins dubbing for ‘Irumudi’, set for Aug 21 releaseDhanush did not enter cinema willingly and cried on his debut set, reveals father Kasthuri RajaBollywood stars shower blessings on Anshula Kapoor Rohan Thakkar at wedding receptionShilpa Shirodkar recalls losing Chaiya Chaiya with SRKWatch Russian couple dramatic proposal atop Empire State Building sparks global buzzAamir Khan says his wedding with partner Gauri Spratt will be intimate affair with family and friendsActress Sreeleela recalls balancing MBBS medical exams with Viral Vayyari song shoot on Doctors DayUS removes four Indian firms from sanctions listSuriya joins hands with T J Gnanavel for new hombale films projectUS Iran agree to sustain Strait of Hormuz ceasefire resume broader nuclear talks

Resolution on Wakf Board chairman honorarium stayed

Posted December 16th, 2014, 12:44 PM IST

Resolution on Wakf Board chairman honorarium stayed

Chennai: The Madras high court stayed the operation of a resolution passed by the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, by which the chairman is to be paid a honorarium of Rs 50,000 per month with retrospective effect from the date of his election as chairman.

Justice V. Ramasubramanian also ordered notice, returnable by two weeks, to the state government, TN Wakf Board and Janab Tamizhmagan Hussain, chairman of the TN Wakf Board, on a petition filed by A.K. Rafi Baig, a person interested in the affairs of wakfs in Tamil Nadu.

“In the meantime, there will be an interim stay of the impugned order passed by the chairman of the Wakf Board in a self-serving order passed for his own benefit and that, too, with retrospective effect,” the judge added.

According to the petitioner, the Wakf Act provides the manner in which the board has to be constituted, its various functions and the powers vested with it. The Act provides for payment of allowances to the chairman and members of the board.

However, a resolution was passed at a meeting on October 24, 2013, presided over by the chairman, that the chairman was to be paid a honorarium of Rs 50,000 per month with retrospective effect from the date of his election as chairman.

The resolution was against the provisions of the Act since nowhere in the Act was payment of honorarium or remuneration to the chairman of the board permitted.

Sharing

advertisement
Videos